User talk:澤田弘樹

香港網絡大典，真正屬於香港網民的網絡百科

感謝您對香港網絡大典的興趣與貢獻，希望您會喜歡上這裡。下面有幾篇新手應該了解的重要文章：

關鍵方針：1. 編輯守則、2. 中立觀點、3. 可供查證、4. 生者傳記、5. 保障私隱、6. 尊重他人和 7. 沒有絕對的規則。

簡明版權信息，您在香港網絡大典所貢獻全部內容必須是您所著，或擁有授權，並同意在GFDL條款下發行。

如何編輯 / 使用手冊 / 使用指南 / 格式手冊 / 如何寫出好條目

我希望你能享受編寫條目的快樂，成為一名香港網絡大典編輯者。請在討論後簽名，可使用四條浪紋（~~~~）或編輯工具條上的「簽名按鈕」。如有任何問題，請參閱幫助、到對管理員的意見和建議詢問、或在我的對話頁提出，您也可以在沙盒測試香港網絡大典的編輯功能。

If you have any questions about the Encyclopedia of Virtual Communities in Hong Kong, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting Encyclopedia of Virtual Communities in Hong Kong!

我是歡迎您的香港網絡大典編輯者：--kirk 18:12 2007年十月26日 (UTC)

目錄 1 55 2 通知 3 要求解封桃子糾紛及天空之城會員對桃子的評價，及桃子的回應 4 About Ewai_leong's edit on my (doraemonserv2)'s profile 5 你篇篇條文都話有攻擊成份，根本就冇資格做管理員！ 6 218.189.215.184 7 Are you HKGolden User? I wanna join HKGolden to call for anti-konggirlism 8 About a book 9 about an entry which you find it problematic 10 About my profile in Komica 11 首頁 12 建議推行「質量提升計劃」 13 無論是支持或反對 14 可以嗎?

[編輯] 55

大典有太多劣質條目，支持你正進行的去蕪存菁，請繼續努力

提交刪除時，請多參考香港網絡大典:刪除守則和香港網絡大典:快速刪除(快速刪除的標準) --華文翰 11:09 2007年十月9日 (UTC)

[編輯] 通知

閣下已被提升為sysop。原因：evchk的違規眾多，減輕其他sysop負擔；sysop華文翰的推薦(見此)；閣下加入時間雖短，但熱心討論和協助處理社群事宜，並有維基編輯經驗。--kirk 18:12 2007年十月26日 (UTC)

[編輯] 要求解封桃子糾紛及天空之城會員對桃子的評價，及桃子的回應

要求解封桃子糾紛及天空之城會員對桃子的評價，及桃子的回應

[編輯] About Ewai_leong's edit on my (doraemonserv2)'s profile

He often make negative comments to me.

This is okey, but he forget to state that such comment is made by himself.

Also, he failed to give a solid evidence to support his view.

So I simply remark the owner of the comments and add "to be verified" descriptor. I will not delete his sayings because I want to see how local netizens deem me in long run.

Please nofify me in my talk page ASAP should you find any problem, thanks.

---

appendix:

Here is my voice: Ewai_leong 是以檢舉為樂的一群人之一,喜歡檢舉他人令其被刪題的一種瘋癲行為,檢痴有時會亂檢題目,甚至向對方表明會檢舉對方,一有時間就會檢舉,相信這些人檢舉他人後會好high好有快感,這種人行為變態,所以稱為痴漢,應到青山醫院接受治療

He is 痴 because he has once posted a 18X pic in my blog.

Analogy: 檢舉痴漢

You know, he only makes 論點 then rush to decision making as conclusion (i.e. removing only my edit as implicit personal attack), while deliberately ignoring the proof process. So if he delete anything in EVCHK further, I will RV the suffered items and treat him as 小朋友

Source:

• http://doraemonserv.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=897954
• http://doraemonserv.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=854667

同御宅族玩弄邏輯謬誤?他,身為HKU大二生,肯定嫌命長,嫌時間太多,到處撩撥他人,我肯定不會忘記... (Note: the saying above is poining to Eawi_leong only)

--Doraemonserv acg 19:02 2007年十二月8日 (UTC)

無意見。不過我在用戶頁上關於資優的內容實在無意針對任何人--我尤其認為如果只有一本的話，軒轅劍斬港女應該先看，然後再同我寫讀書報告--澤田弘樹^{Freely I fly} 19:57 2007年十二月8日 (UTC)

Yes, gifted students are much harder to get identified with because their thinking is not majorly common sense but rare sense, still there exists sometimes when they make sense. ;) --Doraemonserv acg 03:49 2007年十二月9日 (UTC)

[編輯] 你篇篇條文都話有攻擊成份，根本就冇資格做管理員！

any evidence? --Doraemonserv acg 13:04 2007年十二月7日 (UTC)

不要理那位IP，這種言論違反網典政策。--澤田弘樹^{Freely I fly} 15:37 2007年十二月7日 (UTC)

If I were admin I will demand them register in EVCHK with their email address publicized before editing anything, because I found too many selfish, irresponsible IPs or empty EVCHK account users vandalizing and deleting contribution that they find detrimental to their vested interest. --Doraemonserv acg 18:12 2007年十二月7日 (UTC)

[編輯] 218.189.215.184

I wonder why he unqualified EVCHK user can delete my saying in Researcher's talk page:

http://evchk.wikia.com/index.php?title=%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B6%E8%A8%8E%E8%AB%96:Researcher&curid=18514&diff=131591&oldid=131436

--Doraemonserv acg 03:19 2007年十二月13日 (UTC)

[編輯] Are you HKGolden User? I wanna join HKGolden to call for anti-konggirlism

I have applied for a HKGolden account using my HKBN ISP email account, but after the application is successful I cannot receive the confirmation letter from my HKBN mail host. What is the problem behind? My HKGolden registered address: pukchnha@hkbn.net. If you know any of the HKGolden ADmin please notify them to tell me why, and to send the password to my back-up email address (provided in HKGolden account appliction page): doraemonserv@yahoo.com.hk . --Doraemonserv acg 07:10 2007年十二月14日 (UTC)

Thanks but no thanks--恕我並不討厭港女（正確點說是沒意見），如果要我去反港女，只會硬膠得成了曲線。況且我和你本來不是盟友關係，這種作法徒添誤解。--澤田弘樹^{Freely I fly} 03:13 2007年十二月15日 (UTC)

Problem fixed. Now my nickname in HKGolden is 烏大龜. See http://forum.hkgolden.com/view.asp?message=1077695 --Doraemonserv acg 04:46 2007年十二月15日 (UTC)

[編輯] About a book

As far as I know 《我的天才噩夢》is categorized as "Psychometrics (Engineering Psychology)" in my currently sitting-for Tsing Yi IVE (Learning Resource Centre, 4/F, i.e. a BIG library open to all post-secondary school students and teaching staffs).

Apart form this book there are many methods to inspect an person with IQ > 130 via:

1. Developmental science: Tracing back his personality growth by dream analysis and reflective drawing (an common issue in CUHK department of Psychology and HKU Asian Research Centre)

2. Statistics based on Physiological findings: Time magazine periodically cite such data regarding human brain discovery, and a popular personality indicators set from Aussies is called Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. (Believe it or not, if you have bought MBTI Manual by e-Cart under franchise of any master level social worker, you will find that 2D vector i and j, 2D matrics and bijective function are the basis of class dichotomy instead of just positive or negative sign (if so, in Mathematics, such sign notation implies conjugate spaces)

3. Astrological method (占卜): A matter of Complex Number and ideography. Populat example includes the typical 180-question based survey on Enneagram.

All in all, we both cannot evade touching on History textbook apart from just WWW (especially HKALE History Syllabuse B: American and Asia History from 1800-1980, not to say contemporary one; you know, that syllabuse has NO offical and comprehensive textbook in Hong Kong, implying after reading anything regarding such chronicles a lot of research and development of whatever format are to be followed up.)

--Doraemonserv acg 07:55 2007年十二月23日 (UTC)

[編輯] about an entry which you find it problematic

I have read your rationale behind so I have replied in my talk page. please see if there is any further possible problems, and any neccessary improvement would be taken. --Doraemonserv acg 22:25 2007年十二月23日 (UTC)

content transfered. You can kill the problematic article anytime, anywhere. --Doraemonserv acg 23:55 2007年十二月23日 (UTC)

[編輯] About my profile in Komica

From the style of writing it is not only irrelevant, of full logical fallacy but also of ewai_leong's ill-defined move. Please mark it as written by Ewai_leong instead of "in general". Clearly ewai_leong is getting even with me, I will NEVER forgive such a mob. --Doraemonserv acg 2008年2月13日 (三) 11:50 (UTC)

我的確同意Komica wiki收錄閣下很有問題，因為你和Komica無關。但Komica wiki始終是網上ACG文化之重要參考來源，有很強的顯著性，所以我特加入以供讀者作參考。上面對你的評論如何，和網典無關。--澤田弘樹^{Freely I fly} 2008年2月13日 (三) 14:26 (UTC)

Anyway, I hope the general public can discriminate between fact and opinion. --Doraemonserv acg 2008年2月14日 (四) 02:49 (UTC)

Note that the original link content has been removed by the Komica admin. For backup, please see http://doraemonserv.googlepages.com/komica.htm . --Doraemonserv acg 2008年2月16日 (六) 00:31 (UTC)

[編輯] 首頁

小弟已更新首頁，你覺得如何？有甚麼可以修改？日後該如何發展？不妨到管理員通訊參與討論。--Hotplug 2008年3月7日 (五) 18:53 (UTC)

[編輯] 建議推行「質量提升計劃」

有感網絡大典條目還有很多改善空間，我建議推行「質量提升計劃」，歡迎進入管理員通訊發表意見。--Hotplug 2008年3月18日 (二) 17:44 (UTC)

[編輯] 無論是支持或反對

請在當前的管理員申請表態，感謝不盡。--疾風綾希 2008年7月9日 (三) 21:01 (UTC)

[編輯] 可以嗎?

可以讓我當管理員嗎? --上官 2008年7月31日 (四) 05:56 (UTC)